Semantic Narrowing

This is not such a harrowing revolution.

To be linguistically strategic.

Though convoluted practice doing this can constitute

A clear way to state things.

Within our meanings

It's a way to be resolute.

Clarity is charity for words and assuages attitudes..

Semantic narrowing is what births

The adherence of our language to such platitudes as the here and now.

It keeps the living lingual linkage vital between individuals and it is how anybody understands anything.

Since it's incorporation from grouping our agreement of guttural utterance denoting meaning it has been a fluid fit to fit the meaning that would be it's container.

Sisgender seems a reversal of this enacted narrowing. See it brings a syntax issue by disregarding a superordinate word depicting the generalized meaning of gender to the subordinate sisgender specified through adopting or attatching sis as the prefix to gender. Based on the narrowed traits people have designated pronouns for, this morphological mishaps constituents are structurally not linguistically lead logic forming the incidental disagreement I feel in my brain when sisgender is ignorantly replacing the fundamental basis it has in our language. There by disconnecting it's little foot it might have had in my door. Reverse the sisgender subordinates semantic-allignment with the original morpheme "gender", and by all means your semantic narrowing would not illicit from me such a quizzical furrowing of my bitch faced eyebrows.

Syntactic and semantic logical linguistics is the way all language identifies, and of all the things to understand practicing respect for, I'd say it would be this idea that vilified those seeking to refute it.

Funny every side is wanting the same thing, and proper semantic narrowing is how we can accrue it.